Chiefs: How Offensive is the O-Line?

40-percent-wide-60-percent-long-spacerChiefs: How Offensive is the O-Line?

Screen Shot 2016-07-24 at 9.39.35 PM

 

Week one was a pleasantly surprising victory (after such a poor start) and week two was a disappointing loss (after watching us repeatedly shoot ourselves in the foot).  However, I wanted to reflect on the performance one more time and see if the numbers matched up with results.

Screen Shot 2016-07-11 at 12.00.27 PM

Do my eyes deceive me?

Screen Shot 2016-07-11 at 12.00.27 PM

When I watch games, I go with the emotional flow.  My impression of the game and performance is based on the collection of snapshots I remember from the game.  These are largely dictated by the camera shots and announcers, with a smattering of me watching what the announcers aren’t pointing out.  As a result, we can be left with a feeling of a player or position group being better/worse than they are.

Screen Shot 2016-07-11 at 12.00.27 PM

So, once the dust settles, I like to move from the photo album to the video.  I want a more complete picture of what went on in the game.  I can then compare and contrast that to my memory.  I generally get about a 70-80% match.

Screen Shot 2016-07-11 at 12.00.27 PM

This week I was reading about how the offensive line had a horrible game.  I didn’t remember them being that bad.  As a matter of fact, I thought they played a pretty good game.  I did see the sacks and saw those breakdowns, but as a percentage of the whole, they were small.

Screen Shot 2016-07-11 at 12.00.27 PM

I went to Pro Football Focus and looked at their ratings of the game.  I would rather we not get into a debate on the validity of their ratings and more focus on the relative results.  I am not thinking they are the definitive answer, but more of a data point.

Screen Shot 2016-07-11 at 12.00.27 PM

Lowlight Reel Performances

Screen Shot 2016-07-11 at 12.00.27 PM

Before I dive into the Offensive Line, a little digression.  As I was looking over the results, the following 2 players were called out for poor play.  One is on the line and the other is a repeat topic on the sites.

Screen Shot 2016-07-11 at 12.00.27 PM

Albert Wilson was called out with the rating/comments below.  I think it pretty accurately assesses his play.  We seem to see the brief flash of talent and then a bunch of no-show performances.  Once again, we see lackluster.  Wilson seems to be a player called out frequently on many websites for his poor play.  I am not sure what the coaching and management staff are seeing that makes them want to hang on to him in the role he is in. Let’s continue to watch and see how long before a move is made.

Screen Shot 2016-07-11 at 12.00.27 PM

Slot receiver: Albert Wilson, Kansas City Chiefs, 42.7

Screen Shot 2016-07-11 at 12.00.27 PM

This is the second week in a row that Albert Wilson makes this list, as he once again had a tough game. Wilson had just three targets on the day, and while he caught two of them, he dropped the third. A mere 11 yards gained isn’t nearly good enough to remove himself from this team.

Screen Shot 2016-07-11 at 12.00.27 PM

The other player is Mitch Morse.  The Center had performed rather admirably to date, but did not have his best game this week.  Although, to be fair, Vince Wilfork isn’t the easiest assignment for anyone.  Let’s hope he moves on from this game and continues to play at a high level progressing throughout the year.

Screen Shot 2016-07-11 at 12.00.27 PM

Center: Mitch Morse, Kansas City Chiefs, 40.7

Screen Shot 2016-07-11 at 12.00.27 PM

Sunday was a day to forget for Mitch Morse, who struggled with both pass and run-blocking. He allowed three quarterback hurries and multiple run-stops against the Texans.

Screen Shot 2016-07-11 at 12.00.27 PM

Offensive Line – Or was it?

Screen Shot 2016-07-11 at 12.00.27 PM

Moving on to the main point of this post.  How did our offensive line perform?  Was there anyone performing above the rest?  Was there any spark of hope in the dismal play?  Did the media get it wrong?  How much is the “Burnt Ends with Fries” plate at Arthur Bryant’s?

Screen Shot 2016-07-11 at 12.00.27 PM

First the ratings.  No filter.  No interpretation.

Screen Shot 2016-07-11 at 12.00.27 PM

PFF Ratings –  (Rank – Overall/Pass/Run)

Screen Shot 2016-07-11 at 12.00.27 PM

LT     15/66 – Eric Fisher ***   (81.1/79.2/81.6)

LG     47/69 – Parker Ehinger   (68.2/78.4/46.3)

LG     15/69 – Zach Fulton ** (78.8/85.8/72.9)

C       29/32 – Mitch Morse ** (44.1/65.2/45.6)

RG    13/69 – L. D. Tardif *** (79.5/84.6/74.2)

RG    49/69 – Jah Reid ***** (65.4/78.2/44.0)

RT    41/66 – M. Schwartz ** (68.0/48.2/78.1)

Screen Shot 2016-07-11 at 12.00.27 PM

How much different was the line from Week 1 to 2?

Screen Shot 2016-07-11 at 12.00.27 PM

Interestingly enough, there was a pretty minor drop-off of .70 from Week 1 to Week 2 overall. However, the pass blocking IMPROVED and the run blocking REGRESSED.  This is not what I would have expected from what I watched and remembered.  Check out the numbers below.

Screen Shot 2016-07-11 at 12.00.27 PM

Aggregate Week 1 average rating – 68.18/71.12/65.16

 

Aggregate Week 2 average rating – 67.48/71.32/64.44

Screen Shot 2016-07-11 at 12.00.27 PM

One more fun fact on the overall line.  If we could have picked the guards (since they are the only ones that changed out), each week, our best line combination would have been the following.  This is the… best overall, best pass, and best run… and isn’t one set of players. So, each combination is different from the others.

Screen Shot 2016-07-11 at 12.00.27 PM

Best Line Combo average rating – 70.3 / 72.6 / 70.48

Screen Shot 2016-07-11 at 12.00.27 PM

What does all this mean?

Screen Shot 2016-07-11 at 12.00.27 PM

If we look at this “massive” sample size of 2 games, the following observations can be extracted from the information.

Screen Shot 2016-07-11 at 12.00.27 PM

       

  1.     Zach Fulton is the better LG.
  2.     Laurent Duvernay-Tardif is the better RG.
  3.     We need to work on our run blocking.
  4.     We may want to consider a strategy of swapping guards during the game, based on the situation.
  5.     We can run on the left side better than the right.
  6.     Our LT is top quarter.
  7.     Our RG is top quarter.
  8.     Our backup LG is top quarter.
  9.     Our C has had a tough start to the season, after a good rookie year.
  10.     Our RT isn’t playing up to expectations (yet, I hope).
  11.     In the changes from the guards’ injuries, we improved on the left and regressed on the right.  

Screen Shot 2016-07-11 at 12.00.27 PM

Should Zach be starting on the left?

Screen Shot 2016-07-11 at 12.00.27 PM

After two weeks of play, we have a mixed bag of performances so far.  The only position/player that seems to be performing… and relatively consistent between pass and rush… is Eric Fisher.  The other positions haven’t stabilized yet (due to numerous reasons).  This should be a top priority for the coaching staff to tackle.  Our offensive success starts with the performance of the line.  While not every position has to be top 10 for the team to succeed, they definitely cannot be a liability in pass/rush.

Screen Shot 2016-07-11 at 12.00.27 PM

I expect Fisher to continue to be strong on the left and Schwartz to improve quickly.  I don’t think any change of personnel is needed here.  The interior line is a bit more of a question mark.  I think Morse will recover and get back on track with the development we saw last year.  The RG position looks like LDT should own it, once recovered from his injury.  If the injury becomes nagging, we need to look for a starter, if Reid doesn’t improve.

Screen Shot 2016-07-11 at 12.00.27 PM

The LG position is another interesting question.  Fulton is performing better than Ehinger, but who has the biggest upside?  Does Ehinger get the job back to allow for development, even though it creates a line weakness?  Or, does Fulton keep it and Ehinger develops in practice and game time if we get up a lot of scores?  Should be fun to watch.

Screen Shot 2016-07-11 at 12.00.27 PM

We shouldn’t overreact based on the performance of 2 games, but we should be aware of where we are trending.  If these levels of performance continue, changes maybe needed.

Screen Shot 2016-07-11 at 12.00.27 PM

And there’s The Rub.

The Rub Frank Leggio LOGO

Screen Shot 2016-07-11 at 12.00.27 PM